
We are made in the image and likeness of our God who creates. It doesnāt matter if we donāt make our living writing, painting, or acting; we are inherently creative.
Now, before you raise a hand in protest, Iām not saying your breakout single has to hit the top of the charts. I would simply encourage all of us to recognize how much creativity is required in our daily lives. Planning a birthday party, mixing a cocktail, and mapping out the childrenās summer schedule are all creative acts. Dinner gets dangerously routine without a pinch of creativity (and umami).
So getting in touch with our creative selves is essential work. Creativity expands our horizon on whatās possible; it breaks us out of a status quo that might otherwise grind away at our souls.
But too often, our creative selves are stifled. Fortunately, Ignatian spirituality has something to say about that. St. Ignatius tells us to act against those tendencies in our lives that put distance between us and Godāeasily said if not done.
In an instance of creative block, what is it we are meant to act against? Bestselling author Julia Cameron, in her classic text/retreat, The Artistās Way: A Spiritual Path to Higher Creativity, encourages all of us to practice what she calls morning pages. āThe morning pages,ā she writes, āare the primary tool of creative recovery.ā
In short, Cameron instructs us to wake up each day and write three pages, not stopping until we reach the end of page three. It doesnāt matter what we write; all that matters is that we do the work.
āAs blocked artists, we tend to criticize ourselves mercilessly,ā Cameron writes. āWe are victims of our own internalized perfectionist, a nasty internal and external critic, the Censor.ā The Censor, Cameron explains, is that voice in our heads, perhaps formed in childhood, that says you canāt do it. Your work is lousy, and even if you had one success, youāll never have another. The Censor stops us before we start, insisting that weāre no good and that nothing we could possibly create is worthwhile. Why even bother?
The Censor, I believe, is just another word for the evil spirit, or what Ignatius helpfully names the enemy of our human nature. Weāre made in the image and likeness of our God, who creates; it only makes sense that the enemy of our human nature would stand in the way of our creativity.
And so, a practice like the morning pages is our effort to act against that evil spirit. āBecause there is no wrong way to write the morning pages, the Censorās opinion doesnāt count,ā Cameron writes. āLet the Censor rattle on. Just keep your hand moving across the page.ā
Thereās another Ignatian parallel to be drawn here. The morning pages are, in many ways, the raw material of the Examen, that daily prayer in which we sort through our day in gratitude to the Spirit. When it comes to morning pagesāor a journal or a diaryāwhat do we have to write about each day if not, in part, reflections drawn from our own lives? What comes out onto the page each morning (or afternoon or evening) is what we also bring to God in prayer. That raw, unedited stuff is then examined with the Spirit, and we seek out those places where God is speaking to us, showing us something new or important.
But the evil spirit doesnāt want that either. How often does the Censor try to insinuate some evil will into our prayer, insisting that we are not, in fact, the beloved of God? That we are not worth delighting in? That God couldnāt possibly be at work in the mundane, ordinary, seemingly useless details of our lives?
Again, we act against. We push on in creativity and in prayer, trusting that our God of infinite delight is intimately at work in our days. We push on, knowing that those little gems of creativityāthat new recipe, renewed garden bed, or restored piece of furnitureāare little reflections of Godās Spirit acting within us.
Then, in hope, we wait and watch and work to see what good fruits our creativity bears.
Photo by Steve Johnson on Pexels.
